Under-bench and upright units
Self-contained, loose and easily resold. The best security in this class and the simplest to finance, though the amounts are often small enough that fees matter.
Refrigeration is the only equipment on this site where a failure destroys the stock inside it, which is why the replacement decision is usually driven by reliability rather than by age.
Last reviewed 7 September 2026
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$326/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
5 years at 11.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
What it is
Refrigeration finance is a secured facility over identified plant, with the lender registering a security interest on the Personal Property Securities Register. Loose equipment such as display cabinets, upright chillers and blast freezers is straightforward security. Built-in cool rooms, condensing units mounted to a building and pipework runs are much less so, and the split between the two is what drives the terms offered.
The distinctive feature of this class is that the plant exists to protect something. A cool store in a packhouse is holding produce, a chiller in a butchery is holding stock that cannot be replaced by Monday, and a cabinet in a supermarket aisle is holding the product being sold. That means the cost of a failure is not the repair bill; it is the repair bill plus the stock, plus the trading interruption, plus in food businesses a food safety question about whatever was in there.
Which is why the replacement decision in refrigeration looks different from every other class here. Businesses do not usually replace a cool store because it is old. They replace it because the failure risk has become unacceptable relative to what is inside, or because the energy cost of running tired plant continuously has grown into a number worth acting on. Both of those are good reasons, and both are better framed against the avoided cost than against the rate on the facility.
Common amount
$25k to $90k
Indicative rate band
9% to 16% p.a.
Runs
Continuously
Registered on
PPSR
By type
Indicative New Zealand purchase bands, illustrative only. Capacity, temperature range, refrigerant, whether the plant is remote or self-contained, and installation complexity all move these considerably. A supplier quote decides an actual purchase.
Self-contained, loose and easily resold. The best security in this class and the simplest to finance, though the amounts are often small enough that fees matter.
Retail and food service. Steady demand keeps the used market reasonable, and appearance affects resale value more than mechanical condition does.
Built into the premises with panel construction. Recoverable only at meaningful cost, so lenders discount them heavily against loose equipment of the same value.
Food production and catering. High capital cost, specific compliance value in a food control plan, and a small New Zealand used market.
The machinery behind a large room. Often the item that fails and the item that gets replaced independently of the room it serves.
Truck and trailer units. Financed with the vehicle where fitted at purchase, and assessed on their own service life thereafter.
Hospitality and retail. Water quality drives service life more than usage does, which is why maintenance history matters to a valuation.
Temperature logging and alarms. Small relative to the plant, and disproportionately valuable because they turn a catastrophic failure into an inconvenient one.
The common case

The real arithmetic
A cool store failure over a long weekend can destroy stock worth several times the annual finance payment, interrupt trading, and in a food business raise a food safety question about everything that was inside. Against that, a difference of two percentage points on a facility is a rounding error. The comparison worth making before a refrigeration purchase is the cost of the new plant against the expected cost of the failure it prevents, including the stock, the interruption and the compliance consequence. That framing usually settles the decision faster than a rate comparison does, and it is the reason temperature monitoring pays for itself.
Indicative bands
Indicative bands only, and not an offer of credit. The driver here is how much of the plant could be removed and resold rather than how old it is.
| Plant profile | Typical maximum term | Deposit commonly sought | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loose, self-contained units | 48 to 60 months | 0% to 10% | The simplest case. Recoverable, identifiable and with a working used market. |
| Display cabinets, new | 48 to 60 months | 0% to 15% | Straightforward security. Condition and appearance drive resale more than the mechanical age. |
| Walk-in rooms, built in | 36 to 48 months | 15% to 25% | Removable only at cost. Treated closer to a fit-out than to equipment. |
| Cool store plant, remote | 36 to 60 months | 10% to 20% | The machinery is recoverable even where the room is not, which improves the position relative to panel work. |
| Used refrigeration | 24 to 36 months | 20% or more | Refrigerant type and service history matter more than the year, because both affect what can still be serviced. |
Indicative New Zealand market bands for refrigeration finance. Illustrative, not an offer.
Two costs that are not the repayment
Refrigeration runs continuously, which makes it one of the few classes on this site where the energy cost is material enough to change a purchase decision. Older plant with tired seals, a fouled condenser or a failing compressor works harder to hold the same temperature, and on equipment running every hour of every day that difference accumulates into a number worth putting beside the finance payment. A supplier quoting new plant will commonly provide an energy comparison, and it is one of the few supplier-provided figures that is straightforwardly checkable against a power bill.
The second cost is regulatory. New Zealand regulates certain refrigerants, their handling and their disposal, and the rules have tightened over time as older gases have been phased down internationally. The practical consequences are that some older plant becomes progressively more expensive to service as the gas it uses becomes scarcer, that decommissioning has a proper disposal requirement rather than being a skip job, and that plant using a phased-down refrigerant is worth less second-hand than its condition alone suggests.
Neither of these is a reason to replace working equipment on a schedule. Both are reasons that the honest cost comparison between keeping old plant and financing new plant includes more than the repayment, and both are commonly missing from that comparison when it is made quickly.
The process
Written as an observation of what commonly happens rather than as instructions. Every lender differs, and none of this is a guarantee of an outcome.
01
1 to 2 weeks depending on the supplier
A quote covering the equipment, the installation, any pipework and the commissioning is what opens the file. Where a room is being built as well as fitted, the panel work and the plant are commonly quoted separately, and it is worth having both because a lender will treat them differently.
Documents commonly required
02
2 to 7 working days
Trading history carries the usual weight. Where the plant protects stock, lenders commonly also ask what is being stored and what it is worth, because that is what makes the replacement urgent and it is also what a failure would cost.
Documents commonly required
03
Within the assessment window
Lenders separate loose plant from built-in work in the same way they do on a kitchen fit-out. Condensing units, compressors and cabinets are recoverable; panel rooms and pipework are largely not. The proportion drives the deposit more than the total does.
Documents commonly required
04
Aligned to the installation programme
The financier commonly pays the supplier directly and registers its security interest on the PPSR. On a replacement of failing plant, commissioning and changeover are frequently scheduled around trading, and the first payment usually falls a month after commissioning.
Documents commonly required
Where refrigeration is being replaced because it is failing, the changeover itself needs a plan for the stock. That is an operating question rather than a finance one, and it is the part most often left until the week of installation.
Worked scenarios
Illustrative scenarios on stated assumptions. The figures are indicative and are produced by the calculator on this page rather than quoted by any lender.
Replacing cool store plant ahead of a season
The condensing plant on a cool store has failed twice in eighteen months and the room holds produce through a compressed picking season. Replacement plant is quoted at $145,000 plus GST, with the room itself staying as it is.
On these assumptions a 60-month facility at an indicative 10.5% carries a repayment near $700 a week. The comparison the business is actually making is against the value of a season’s produce in that room, which is a much larger number. The plant is recoverable even though the room is not, which keeps the deposit at the lower end.
Indicative figures
Adding a blast chiller and replacing display cabinets
The business is quoted $78,000 plus GST for a blast chiller and a run of new display cabinets, partly to improve food safety margins and partly because the existing cabinets are visibly tired in a retail space.
In this scenario the split matters. The cabinets are loose and resell readily; the blast chiller is a smaller New Zealand market. The facility is written over the two together at 48 months, and the energy saving on the replaced cabinets is a real figure the business puts beside the repayment rather than a marketing claim it ignores.
Indicative figures
Building a new walk-in freezer in leased premises
A new walk-in freezer is quoted at $96,000 plus GST, of which roughly $60,000 is panel construction and installation and the balance is plant.
In this scenario the weighting toward built-in work is what drives the terms. The lender is effectively unsecured on the panel construction, so a deposit is sought and the term is set nearer four years than five. The lease has four years to run, which the lender checks for exactly the same reason it checks it on a kitchen fit-out.
Indicative figures
Honest assessment
The market
Editorial only. These are the kinds of lender active in this class, listed to describe the market rather than to recommend any of them. We hold no relationship with the lenders named here.
Best for mixed plant and installation
Non-bank financiers used to fit-out style facilities where part of the spend is recoverable and part is not. The most common source for this class, at an indicative rate above bank pricing.
Best for larger cool store projects
Typically the sharpest indicative pricing, and most comfortable on substantial plant for an established business with financial statements available.
Best for single plant replacement
Suppliers frequently arrange finance on their own equipment, sometimes bundled with a service agreement. Convenient, and the service arrangement is worth reading as a separate commitment.
Best for leased premises
Operating leases on refrigeration exist and suit a business in premises it may not keep, because the plant goes back rather than being owned into a tenancy that has ended.
Names are deliberately generic. A comparison of specific lenders would need current pricing we cannot substantiate, and publishing it would be a claim rather than information.
Test the maths
Pre-filled with a plant replacement over five years. The comparison worth making is this figure against the cost of the failure it prevents. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative repayment
Weekly
$326/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
5 years at 11.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
The published source for the refrigerant handling and disposal requirements referred to on this page.
Backs the reference to temperature control obligations in a food control plan.
The register on which a security interest over refrigeration plant is recorded.
The published source for the depreciation treatment referred to on this page.
The published source for the GST treatment referred to on this page.
Context for the description of energy cost differences between older and newer refrigeration plant.
FAQ
It covers display cabinets, under-bench and upright units, blast chillers, walk-in cool rooms and freezers, and the condensing plant that runs them. The facility is secured against the identified equipment with a security interest registered on the Personal Property Securities Register, and installation is commonly financed alongside the plant where it forms part of the same purchase.
Because recoverability differs. A self-contained cabinet can be unbolted, wheeled out and resold. A panel-built cool room can be dismantled only at meaningful cost and is worth little away from the space it was built for. Lenders discount the built-in portion, which shows up as a deposit rather than as a higher headline rate.
Typically when the failure risk becomes unacceptable relative to what the plant is protecting, or when the energy cost of running tired equipment continuously has grown into a number worth acting on. Age alone is rarely the trigger, because well-maintained refrigeration can run for many years.
A failure destroys the stock inside, interrupts trading, and in a food business raises a question about the safety of everything that was in there. On a cool store holding a season’s produce or a week’s meat, the value inside routinely exceeds the value of the plant by a wide margin, which is why temperature monitoring is disproportionately worthwhile.
Indirectly. New Zealand regulates certain refrigerants and their handling, and gases being phased down internationally become progressively more expensive and harder to source. Plant using such a refrigerant is worth less second-hand than its condition alone suggests, and lenders take that into account when valuing used equipment.
On equipment running continuously, it is material enough to affect the decision. Tired seals, fouled condensers and failing compressors all make plant work harder to hold the same temperature. Suppliers commonly provide an energy comparison, and it is one of the few supplier figures that can be checked directly against a power bill.
Under a hire purchase, a GST-registered business is generally able to claim the GST on the full purchase price in the return covering the period the agreement begins rather than across the payments, subject to the accountant’s confirmation of the accounting basis used. Under an operating lease the GST is typically claimed on each rental as it is invoiced, again subject to the accountant’s confirmation.
It matters for the built-in portion for the same reason it matters on a kitchen fit-out. Plant installed into leased premises is exposed to the tenancy, and a facility running longer than the lease leaves payments on equipment in a space the business may no longer occupy. Loose plant is far less exposed, because it moves with the business.
Yes, on shorter terms and commonly with a deposit. Refrigerant type and documented service history matter more than the calendar age, because both determine what can still be serviced and what the plant would be worth to the next buyer. Water quality history matters on ice machines specifically.
Sometimes, and the honest comparison includes the probability of the next failure. Where a repair restores several years of reliable service for a fraction of replacement cost, it is frequently the better decision. Where the plant has failed repeatedly, the repair is buying time rather than reliability, and the stock inside is what is at risk in the meantime.
Commonly yes, where bought at the same time. Temperature logging and alarm systems are small relative to the plant and disproportionately valuable, because they turn an undetected failure over a weekend into an alert that can be acted on. They are also frequently required or expected within a food control plan.
The financier recovers what can be economically removed, which means the loose plant and the condensing units rather than the panel rooms and pipework. Used refrigeration sells at a discount, and the difference between what is realised and the balance owing commonly remains payable by the business and by any guarantor.
Related
Commercial kitchen finance
The wider fit-out this plant usually sits inside.
Read onTruck finance
Refrigerated transport bodies, and how they are financed with the vehicle.
Read onHospitality equipment finance
How cafes, restaurants and bars approach equipment as a sector.
Read onAgriculture equipment finance
Packhouse and on-farm cold chain, and the seasonality behind it.
Read onWhat equipment lenders assess
Why the recoverable share drives the deposit in this class.
Read onAll equipment finance guides
Every machine class covered on this site.
Read onDisclaimer
Financing a machine is a commitment that runs for years, and the repayments come out of the same operating cash flow as everything else. Modelling the weekly and monthly cost against the working-capital position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Equipmentfinance.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.