Skip to content
Equipmentfinance.org.nz
Stacked laptops beside an external monitor and a docking station on an office desk
Technology

IT and technology finance for New Zealand businesses.

Technology is the one class on this site where the asset is worth almost nothing by the end of the term, which changes both the structure that fits and the argument for financing it at all.

Last reviewed 7 September 2026

Indicative repayment

Weekly

Disclaimer

$428/week

$1,853 /month $11,714 total interest
$55,000
$5,000 $500,000
3 years
6 months 5 years
13.00% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

The short version

Technology finance in five lines.

  • The security is nearly worthless. Lenders are effectively lending against the business rather than against the hardware, which is why pricing here sits closer to unsecured business lending than to asset finance.
  • Match the term to the refresh cycle. A four-year facility on a three-year laptop fleet means paying for machines already replaced, which is the most common mistake in this class.
  • Leasing genuinely suits this asset. Where equipment will be replaced rather than kept, an operating lease that takes the hardware back at the end is doing something a hire purchase cannot.
  • Subscriptions are not financeable. Software billed monthly is an operating cost, not a purchase, and it sits outside any facility. On a modern IT project it is frequently most of the spend.
  • Indicative only. Every band on this page is illustrative. Actual rates, fees and terms come from the lender after assessment of the business and the specific equipment.

What it is

Asset finance where the asset barely counts.

IT and technology finance is nominally a secured facility over identified equipment, with the lender registering a security interest on the Personal Property Securities Register. In practice the security does very little work. Recovering forty laptops distributed across a workforce is impractical, and even a clean recovery of a three-year-old fleet realises a small fraction of what it cost.

That has a direct effect on pricing and terms. Lenders in this class are substantially assessing the business rather than the hardware, so indicative rates sit closer to unsecured business lending than to the asset finance bands elsewhere on this site, and terms are shorter because the equipment’s useful life is shorter. Neither of those is unreasonable; they are the honest consequence of what is being financed.

What follows from it is more useful than the rate. Because the equipment will be replaced rather than kept, the structure that fits is often not the one that ends in ownership. An operating lease returning the hardware at the end genuinely solves a problem here, in a way it does not on a forklift that will still be working in fifteen years. And because so much modern technology spend is subscription rather than purchase, a good deal of an IT budget cannot be financed at all and simply has to be paid from operating cash flow.

Common refresh cycle

3 to 4 years

Indicative rate band

11% to 20% p.a.

Residual value

Very low

Registered on

PPSR

By category

What business technology typically costs.

Indicative New Zealand purchase bands, illustrative only. Specification, quantity, warranty term and whether equipment is bought or leased all move these considerably. A supplier quote decides an actual purchase.

$1.5k to $4k each

Laptops and desktops

The bulk of most fleets. Individually small, collectively substantial, and the category where matching the term to the refresh cycle matters most.

$8k to $60k

Servers and storage

On-premise infrastructure. Longer useful life than end-user devices, and increasingly displaced by cloud services that cannot be financed as equipment.

$5k to $45k

Network hardware

Switches, firewalls, access points and cabling. Cabling is installed into premises and is unrecoverable, which lenders treat like any other fit-out work.

$6k to $40k

Point of sale systems

Terminals, printers, cash drawers and scanners. Retail and hospitality hardware with a reasonable working life and a modest used market.

$10k to $80k

Audiovisual and conferencing

Displays, room systems and control. Installed into meeting spaces, so partly recoverable and partly not, and dating on a display refresh cycle.

$4k to $30k

Printers and multifunction devices

Frequently supplied on a click-charge contract rather than bought, which is a separate commitment with its own term and minimum volume.

$5k to $50k

Perpetual software licences

Licences bought outright can be financed with the hardware. Subscription licensing cannot, and is an operating cost.

$8k to $60k

Installation and migration

Configuration, data migration and professional services. Real project costs that some lenders will include in a facility and others will not.

The common case

A laptop fleet refresh.

Stacked laptops beside an external monitor and a docking station on an office desk
End-user devices are most of a typical IT facility, and they are the category where a term running past the refresh cycle costs the most.

The structural question

The term and the refresh cycle have to be the same number.

A business that replaces its laptops every three years and finances them over four spends the fourth year paying for machines that have already been replaced, while also paying for their replacements. Doing that twice puts the business permanently a year behind itself, carrying two facilities where it intended to carry one. This is the most common and most avoidable mistake in technology finance, and it is entirely a matter of arithmetic rather than judgement.

The fix is to decide the refresh cycle first and set the term to match. Where devices are kept four years, a four-year term is right. Where they are replaced at three, the term is three even though a longer term would show a lower weekly figure. The lower figure on the longer term is not a saving; it is the cost of the mismatch, deferred.

This is also the argument for an operating lease in this class specifically. Elsewhere on this site a lease is one structure among several. Here it aligns naturally with what actually happens to the equipment, because the hardware goes back at the end of the term instead of sitting in a cupboard, and the refresh and the facility end on the same day by construction rather than by discipline.

What cannot be financed

Subscriptions are an operating cost, not a purchase.

A large share of a modern technology budget is subscription rather than capital. Cloud infrastructure, software billed per user per month, security services, backup and connectivity are all operating costs, and none of them can be financed as equipment because nothing is being bought. On many New Zealand IT projects the subscription component now exceeds the hardware component, which means the finance facility covers a minority of the spend. A project budget that shows only the financed portion is showing the smaller half.

Indicative bands

How the equipment type moves the terms offered.

Indicative bands only, and not an offer of credit. Terms here are shorter and rates higher than elsewhere on this site, because the security is genuinely weaker.

Equipment typeTypical maximum termDeposit commonly soughtNotes
End-user devices24 to 36 months0% to 10%Terms follow the refresh cycle rather than the physical life, which is longer.
Servers and storage36 to 48 months0% to 15%Longer useful life supports a longer term, where the business genuinely intends to keep it.
Network and cabling36 to 48 months10% to 20%Cabling is installed and unrecoverable, so it is treated closer to fit-out work than to equipment.
Point of sale and AV36 months0% to 15%Reasonable working lives and a modest used market. Installed AV components are discounted.
Used or refurbished ITRarely financedNot applicableValues are too low and fall too fast for a facility to make sense. Commonly bought outright instead.

Indicative New Zealand market bands for technology finance. Illustrative, not an offer.

The alternatives

Finance, lease, buy outright, or move to a service.

Businesses prioritising cash preservation typically finance or lease. Businesses whose need is a capability rather than a device increasingly buy it as a service. The right answer follows what is actually needed.

FeatureHire purchaseOperating leaseBuy outrightMove to a service
Who owns itThe businessThe lessorThe businessThe provider
At end of termAgeing hardware to dispose ofHardware goes backAgeing hardware to dispose ofNothing to dispose of
Refresh disciplineRequires itBuilt inRequires itBuilt in
Upfront cashDeposit or nilFirst monthFull priceNone
FinanceableYesYesYesNo, it is an operating cost
Fits whenHardware will be keptHardware will be replacedCash is available and cheapThe need is capability, not hardware

The fourth column is where a growing share of technology spend has gone, and it is not a finance decision at all. Where a cloud service replaces a server, the question stops being how to fund the purchase and becomes whether the operating cost is acceptable.

The process

What a technology finance application typically involves.

Written as an observation of what commonly happens rather than as instructions. Every lender differs, and none of this is a guarantee of an outcome.

  1. 01

    Same week in most cases

    The project is quoted and split

    A supplier quote separating hardware, perpetual licences, installation and subscription components is what opens the file. That split matters more here than in any other class, because only part of it is financeable and the rest lands on operating cash flow.

    Documents commonly required

    • Supplier quote with the components separated
    • Equipment schedule with serial numbers where available
  2. 02

    1 to 5 working days

    The business is assessed, and the equipment mostly is not

    Because the security is weak, assessment rests on trading history and serviceability more than on what is being bought. Twelve months of bank statements and the NZBN cover most applications, with financial statements requested at the larger end.

    Documents commonly required

    • 12 months of bank statements
    • NZBN and GST details
    • Financial statements above larger amounts
  3. 03

    Within the assessment window

    The structure is chosen against the refresh cycle

    This is the step worth spending time on. Where the hardware will be replaced at the end, an operating lease returns it and ends cleanly. Where it will be kept, a hire purchase makes more sense. Setting a term longer than the refresh cycle is the decision that causes problems later.

    Documents commonly required

    • Proposed term and structure
  4. 04

    1 to 3 working days after acceptance

    Documents are issued and settlement occurs

    The financier commonly pays the supplier directly and registers its security interest on the PPSR. On a staged rollout, settlement may follow deliveries, and the first payment usually falls a month after the equipment is delivered.

    Documents commonly required

    • Signed finance agreement
    • Delivery confirmations

Data on equipment being returned at the end of a lease is the business’s responsibility rather than the lessor’s. Secure erasure before return is an obligation worth confirming in the lease terms and planning for, because the return date is fixed and the erasure is not automatic.

Worked scenarios

Three New Zealand technology purchases, illustratively.

Illustrative scenarios on stated assumptions. The figures are indicative and are produced by the calculator on this page rather than quoted by any lender.

32 staff, three-year laptop refresh

An Auckland professional services firm

The firm is replacing its laptop fleet and the hardware comes to $86,000 plus GST, with docking stations and monitors included.

In this scenario an operating lease over 36 months is chosen over a hire purchase, because the fleet will be replaced again at the end and nobody wants forty ageing laptops in a cupboard. The lease and the refresh cycle end on the same day by construction. Secure erasure before return is planned into the changeover rather than discovered at it.

Indicative figures

Hardware total
$86,000 + GST
Structure
Operating lease
Term
36 months
End of term
Hardware returns

Six stores, point of sale replacement

A Christchurch retailer

The retailer is replacing point of sale hardware across six stores at $52,000 plus GST, alongside a subscription platform billed monthly per till.

On these assumptions a 36-month facility at an indicative 13% carries a repayment near $400 a week on the hardware. The subscription cannot be financed and sits on the operating account, and in this scenario it is comparable in size to the repayment. Budgeting for the financed portion alone would have understated the project by roughly half.

Indicative figures

Hardware
$52,000 + GST
Term
36 months
Indicative weekly
~$400
Subscription
Operating cost, not financed

Replacing an on-premise server

A Wellington engineering consultancy

The consultancy’s server is at end of support and the options are a replacement at $38,000 plus GST or a move to cloud infrastructure billed monthly.

In this scenario the decision is not a finance decision. Financing the replacement is straightforward on a 48-month term. Moving to a service removes the capital question entirely and replaces it with an operating cost that never ends. The comparison worth making is the total of four years of finance plus the eventual replacement against four years of subscription, and it is specific to the workload.

Indicative figures

Server replacement
$38,000 + GST
Term if financed
48 months
Alternative
Cloud, not financeable
Real question
Capital or operating

Honest assessment

Where technology finance fits, and where it does not.

Where it fits

  • The refresh is substantial enough that paying cash would strain working capital
  • The term has been set to match the refresh cycle rather than to lower the weekly figure
  • An operating lease is available and the hardware is genuinely going back at the end
  • The equipment has a useful life long enough to justify a facility, such as a server
  • The subscription component of the project has been budgeted separately and honestly

Where it does not

  • The amount is small enough that fees and the higher rate outweigh the cash-flow benefit
  • The equipment is used or refurbished, where values are too low for a facility to make sense
  • A cloud service would remove the hardware question entirely
  • The term on offer runs past the point the equipment will be replaced
  • Most of the project is subscription and the financed portion is a small fraction of it

The market

Who writes technology finance in New Zealand.

Editorial only. These are the kinds of provider active in this class, listed to describe the market rather than to recommend any of them. We hold no relationship with those named here.

Best for fleets on a refresh cycle

Technology lessors

Specialists in operating leases over end-user devices, including return and disposal at the end of the term. The structure that fits this asset best, and the one banks offer least often.

Best for mixed hardware projects

Specialist asset financiers

Non-bank financiers writing hire purchase over technology hardware, commonly at an indicative rate above bank pricing because the security is weak.

Best for larger infrastructure

Bank business lending

For substantial server and network projects, standard business lending is frequently simpler and cheaper than asset finance, precisely because the asset adds little security either way.

Best for bundled projects

IT providers and resellers

Resellers frequently arrange finance alongside hardware, sometimes bundling support. Convenient, and the support component is worth reading as a separate commitment.

Names are deliberately generic. A comparison of specific providers would need current pricing we cannot substantiate, and publishing it would be a claim rather than information.

Test the maths

A technology refresh, in weekly numbers.

Pre-filled with a mid-size hardware refresh over three years. Remember that any subscription component sits outside this figure. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.

Indicative repayment

Weekly

Disclaimer

$428/week

$1,853 /month $11,714 total interest
$55,000
$5,000 $500,000
3 years
6 months 5 years
13.00% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

References

Sources

FAQ

IT and technology finance in New Zealand, questions answered

Why are technology finance rates higher than other equipment finance?

Because the security is genuinely weaker. Recovering distributed end-user devices is impractical, and a recovered three-year-old fleet realises a small fraction of its cost. Lenders in this class are substantially assessing the business rather than the hardware, so indicative pricing sits closer to unsecured business lending than to the asset finance bands elsewhere.

How long should an IT facility run for?

The same length as the refresh cycle. A four-year facility on a three-year fleet means paying for machines already replaced while also paying for their replacements, and doing that twice leaves a business permanently carrying two facilities where it intended to carry one. A longer term shows a lower weekly figure and is not a saving.

Is leasing better than financing for IT equipment?

For equipment that will be replaced rather than kept, an operating lease does something a hire purchase cannot, because the hardware goes back at the end and the refresh and the facility end on the same day by construction. For a server the business intends to run for five years, a hire purchase ending in ownership makes more sense.

Can software be financed?

Perpetual licences bought outright can usually be financed alongside the hardware, because something is actually being purchased. Subscription software billed per user per month cannot, because nothing is bought. On many New Zealand projects the subscription component now exceeds the hardware, so a facility covers a minority of the spend.

Can cloud services be financed?

No. Cloud infrastructure is an operating cost rather than a capital purchase, so there is no asset to secure and nothing to finance. Where a cloud service replaces a server, the question stops being how to fund a purchase and becomes whether an ongoing operating cost is acceptable, which is a different decision entirely.

Is used or refurbished IT equipment financeable?

Rarely, and it is usually not worth pursuing. Values are low and fall quickly, so the facility costs more to arrange than the security is worth. Refurbished hardware is more commonly bought outright, which avoids both the arrangement cost and the term-matching problem.

When is the GST claimable on financed IT equipment?

Under a hire purchase, a GST-registered business is generally able to claim the GST on the full purchase price in the return covering the period the agreement begins rather than across the payments, subject to the accountant’s confirmation of the accounting basis used. Under an operating lease the GST is typically claimed on each rental as it is invoiced, again subject to the accountant’s confirmation.

What happens to the data on leased equipment at the end of term?

Secure erasure is the business’s obligation rather than the lessor’s, and the return date is fixed whether or not it has been done. Planning it into the changeover rather than discovering it on the return date is the practical answer, and the lease terms are worth reading for what condition equipment must be returned in.

Should installation and migration be included in the facility?

Some lenders will include configuration, data migration and professional services in a facility and others will not. Where they can be included, it keeps the project on one agreement. Where they cannot, they land on operating cash flow at the same time as the hardware arrives, which is worth knowing in advance.

Is a printer click-charge contract the same as finance?

No. A click charge is a service arrangement billing per page with its own term and commonly a minimum monthly volume, and it is a separate commitment from any equipment finance. It is frequently signed at the same time as hardware is supplied, and the two together are the real cost.

Does network cabling get financed?

It can be, and lenders treat it more like fit-out work than like equipment because it is installed into the premises and cannot be recovered. That means it commonly attracts a deposit, and where the premises are leased the lease term matters for the same reasons it does in hospitality.

Is it worth financing a small IT purchase at all?

Frequently not. On small amounts, the arrangement fee and the higher rate in this class together can outweigh the cash-flow benefit of spreading the cost. Where the purchase is small enough to absorb without straining working capital, paying for it outright is commonly the cheaper and simpler answer.

Disclaimer

Indicative content only. Not personalised financial advice.

Financing a machine is a commitment that runs for years, and the repayments come out of the same operating cash flow as everything else. Modelling the weekly and monthly cost against the working-capital position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.

What this site is

A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.

What the figures show

Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.

What the lender decides

Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.

Commercial disclosure

Equipmentfinance.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.

Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.

This page is
coming soon.

Important information

About this site, the figures, and your protections.

Last reviewed 7 September 2026.

1. What this site is

Equipmentfinance.org.nz is a New Zealand education site and a free repayment calculator. It is not a lender, not a broker, and not a registered financial adviser. We do not arrange credit, hold client money, or provide regulated financial advice as defined under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 6 or the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Act 2019. Nothing on this site is personalised financial advice.

2. The calculator and figures

All numbers shown by the calculator, in worked examples, and across the site are indicative only and modelled from the inputs entered. The figures are not a quote, not an offer of credit, and not a guarantee of the rate, fees, term, or approval available to any specific business. Final pricing, fees, and approval are set by the lender after the lender's own credit assessment.

3. General information, not advice

Content on this site is general information (class information). It does not take into account the financial situation, objectives, or needs of any particular business or person. Before making a borrowing decision, professional advice from a licensed Financial Advice Provider, a chartered accountant, or a solicitor is widely regarded as the safer frame, particularly where amounts are material or the borrowing involves a personal guarantee.

4. Commercial relationship with Prospa

When a calculator user clicks "see if you qualify", the application hands off to Prospa, our New Zealand SME finance partner. Equipmentfinance.org.nz earns a referral commission from Prospa when a referred application converts to a funded loan. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and does not change the rate, fees, or terms Prospa offers the business. We do not claim Prospa is the cheapest or best lender for every applicant. Full disclosure is on our partner page.

5. Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) on this site are general in nature and subject to confirmation by the accountant on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional tax advice from a chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame. Inland Revenue is the primary source for any specific NZ tax-treatment question.

6. Privacy and personal information

Consistent with the Privacy Act 2020, we do not run lead-capture forms on this site. Calculator inputs stay in the browser and are not transmitted to a server we control. We use Google Analytics 4 for aggregate, non-personal traffic data only. When a visitor clicks through to Prospa they leave our site, and Prospa's privacy policy applies. The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) framework applies at the lender level where a sole trader's borrowing is wholly or predominantly for personal use, or where a personal guarantor is involved.

7. Fair dealing posture

This site operates under the fair-dealing requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 2 and the Fair Trading Act 1986. We avoid misleading or deceptive conduct, false representations, and unsubstantiated claims. Numeric or regulatory claims are hedged or sourced to a primary New Zealand authority such as Inland Revenue, MBIE, the Companies Office, WorkSafe, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Stats NZ, the Commerce Commission or the Financial Markets Authority.

8. Limitation of liability and governing law

To the maximum extent permitted by New Zealand law, Equipmentfinance.org.nz, its operators and its contributors are not liable for any loss or damage (direct, indirect, consequential, or otherwise) arising from use of the site or reliance on its content, indicative figures, or third-party information. These terms are governed by the laws of New Zealand. Any disputes are to be resolved in New Zealand courts.

Long form: terms, privacy, footer disclaimer.